Home > News

WhatsApp Threat Spells Out How Accounts Will Be Deleted

By Laura Tucker
Whatsapp Threat Featured

WhatsApp has a strange way of appeasing its users. The embattled social messaging platform is forcing a change in terms on its users after its data-collecting practices were learned. It followed this by threatening its users, then recently clarified what it means. Does this WhatsApp threat really mean that users’ accounts will be deleted if they don’t accept the new terms?

WhatsApp’s Struggles

WhatsApp’s struggles began when Apple’s new iOS 14 feature came to light. It is now requiring all apps in the App Store to disclose what data they collect from users and how they intend to use it.

Facebook, which also owns WhatsApp and Instagram, fought having its data collection practices outed. It was to no avail.

Whatsapp Threat Phone

Once WhatsApp’s data collection practices eventually came to light, users were upset and threatened to move to one of the social messaging app’s competitors.

Users started scoping out other apps, such as Telegram, Signal, and iMessage. With Apple causing this backlash to begin with and Facebook going on the attack, CEO Mark Zuckerberg attacked iMessage specifically.

“I want to highlight that we increasingly see Apple as one of our biggest competitors,” said Zuckerberg. “iMessage is a key linchpin of their ecosystem – which is why iMessage is the most used messaging service in the U.S.”

He also misled the public about iMessage’s practices. “iMessage stores non-end-to-end encrypted backups of your messages by default unless you disable iCloud. … I think that WhatsApp is clearly superior.” ,

Whatsapp Threat Notifications

This is not true, but that didn’t stop Zuckerberg. And iMessage isn’t WhatsApp’s true competitor, as it’s limited to Apple users only. Signal isn’t really a worthy competitor, so the service picking up most of WhatsApp’s defectors is Telegram, yet it doesn’t have the security WhatsApps does. The users who are threatening to leave and switch to Telegram because they are upset about data protection aren’t really ending up with more security.

WA Change to Terms and Threat

WhatsApp announced last month it was issuing privacy changes and noted that users will be required to accept the terms. It promised to give users plenty of time to go over the terms and that it would never delete accounts.

These privacy changes are mostly financial, so may not have the impact users are feairng. Yet, some users were leaving anyway.

Whatsapp Threate Delete App

WhatsApp then announced more recently that it will be, in a roundabout way, deleting user accounts. “WhatsApp will not delete your accounts,” it said. “However, you won’t have full functionality of WhatsApp until you accept.” With accounts being forced to have limited functionality, they may become inactive. Amd apps are deleted after 120 days of inactivity.”

The social messaging app also made excuses for its data collection, noting that the other apps “say they’re better because they know even less information than WhatsApp – we believe people are looking for apps to be both reliable and safe, even if that requires WhatsApp having some limited data.”

The biggest question is how these more recent statements will affect users. WhatsApp lost users already, but there are still many who are hanging in there. Will they continue to stay in light of the WhatsApp threat? Read on to learn about four WhatsApp alternatives that do a better job with privacy.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar
Laura Tucker
Laura has spent more than 20 years writing news, reviews, and op-eds, with the majority of those years as an editor as well. She has exclusively used Apple products for the past 35 years. In addition to writing and editing at MTE, she also runs the site’s sponsored review program.

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
From below of blue starry sky over radio telescope and trees with leaves
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
A contemplative scene with two scientists in a vintage laboratory setting.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.
When seismic waves from the Chicxulub impact reached what is now North Dakota roughly ten minutes after the asteroid struck, they appear to have triggered a ten-metre standing wave in an inland river that flung fish onto the bank and buried them under glass beads still falling from the sky.