Home > News

Ring Doorbell Patents Show Future Uses of Biometric Data

By Laura Tucker
Ring Doorbell Biometric Data Featured

Amazon has taken a lot of flak for providing police departments with Ring Doorbell user data. It also announced with much fanfare its new Sidewalk feature, but it doesn’t seem as if it has been very popular. Regardless, Amazon appears determined to continue along a similar path. In the past few years, Amazon has filed 17 patents that indicate the Ring Doorbell could start using biometric data, specifically facial recognition.

Seventeen Ring Doorbell Patents in Past Few Years

Amazon partnered with 1,963 police departments and provides them footage from users’ Doorbells. It’s not an idea that is very popular with users. Amazon also launched its Sidewalk feature for its range of Alexa devices. Thankfully, it allowed users to opt out of the service that allows people to share their Wi-Fi connection with others who are walking by in the neighborhood. People concerned about privacy were disabling it.

And now, despite these other features not being something people are flocking to, Amazon seems to be continuing along the same path with the 17 patents that were discovered. The patents show all the Ring Doorbell cameras in a neighborhood working together to identify “suspicious” people through biometric data. If those people are seen on someone’s doorstep, all the doors will lock. Homeowners will get an alert if someone who doesn’t live in their home picks up a package from their doorstep.

Ring Doorbell Biometric Data Gun

Patents are just that: patents. They are ideas of possible avenues for a product and/or company. So these aren’t necessarily definite new features for the Ring Doorbell – but these patents as a whole do show a pathway Amazon is interested in exploring.

More facts can be found in other recent activity of the Ring Doorbell product. In 2016, a Ring research and development team in Ukraine was exploring facial recognition. By 2020, Amazon announced it would discontinue the practice of selling facial recognition software to police. But that doesn’t have an effect on the practice of Amazon providing the police with Ring Doorbell footage. At least one of the patents mentions the new technology being used for “criminal prosecution.”

Amazon fought back on these ideas in a statement. “Ring does not have facial recognition technology nor biometrics in any of its devices or services,” said a company spokesperson. “Patents filed or granted do not necessarily reflect products and services that are in development.”

Virtual Neighborhood Watch

It’s as if Amazon is imagining a virtual neighborhood watch with its network of Ring Doorbells and the potential for biometric data. A patent from two months ago discusses a “Neighborhood Alert Mode.” When someone sees a suspicious person in the neighborhood on their Ring Doorbell footage, they can share that with others. If that person shows up on another person’s doorstep, their Doorbells will automatically start recording.

Ring Doorbell Biometric Data Camera

It would be biometric data identifying that person on their doorstep. That data includes facial recognition, as well as palm, finger, retina, iris, skin texture, typing, and gait. It even includes odor recognition.

This just has trouble written all over it. Facial recognition alone has been plagued with problems – especially identifying females and people of color. And to throw the rest of that into the mix just seems problematic, to say the least.

Someone who lives behind me may not be familiar with my adult son, as he moved out on his own five years ago. Say he visits and decides to go for a walk. He’s a big guy and has long hair – someone may think he looks suspicious. They submit footage of him, and now my Ring locks my doors and won’t let him back in. Or maybe the biometric data fails and locks him out after a picture of another big guy with long hair was marked as suspicious.

Ring Doorbell Biometric Data Neighborhood

Another patent uses facial recognition to identify a pattern of “suspicious activity.” It includes a diagram of a neighborhood of homes with a person pointing a gun. Surely that would be a time you would want the increased protection. But could an innocent tool be identified by the cameras as a weapon?

Going Too Far?

Facial recognition is also mentioned in a July 2021 patent. It would be used to give you more information about who’s at your door. A patent from last March would use “fingerprint recognition, eye recognition, voice recognition, and facial recognition” to start audio and video recordings when the Doorbell is pushed. Likewise, door locks and security systems could be disarmed if it’s someone who is known to you.

Do we need this? Or is it enough to just break visitors down into people you know and people you don’t know? The public seems to have already let it be known that they don’t want their information being used by police departments. They want privacy. But if my neighbor’s Ring Doorbell is picking up images of visitors to my home – my family, my friends – and labeling them as suspicious through problematic biometric data and passing the photos and video around, that’s infringing on privacy.

Image Credit: Business Insider

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar
Laura Tucker
Laura has spent more than 20 years writing news, reviews, and op-eds, with the majority of those years as an editor as well. She has exclusively used Apple products for the past 35 years. In addition to writing and editing at MTE, she also runs the site’s sponsored review program.

Read next

In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
A contemplative scene with two scientists in a vintage laboratory setting.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.
When seismic waves from the Chicxulub impact reached what is now North Dakota roughly ten minutes after the asteroid struck, they appear to have triggered a ten-metre standing wave in an inland river that flung fish onto the bank and buried them under glass beads still falling from the sky.
When survivors near Lake Nyos woke on the morning of 22 August 1986, the cattle were dead in the fields, the birds had fallen out of the trees, and 1,746 of their neighbours were lying where they had stood the night before, with no fire, no flood, and no wound to explain it.
In October 2002, a Russian scientist named Dimitri Malashenkov stood up at a space conference in Houston and quietly explained that the dog Laika, whom the Soviet Union had publicly mourned as a heroic week-long orbiter in 1957, had actually died of heat and panic within about five hours of launch.