Home > News

Meta to Adopt X’s Moderation System

By Crystal Crowder
Facebook logo and address.

No matter who you ask, Meta’s moderation system doesn’t always work well. It either doesn’t censor enough or censors too much. Mark Zuckerberg is now adopting a new moderation system similar to X’s, formerly Twitter – so in other words, it will permanently not censor much.

No More Fact Checking on Meta

In a desire to better embrace free speech, Zuckerberg announced new Meta moderation policies. The main change is no more fact checking, at least as it is right now. Previously, Meta worked with trusted fact-checkers to remove false content to make Meta platforms more trustworthy.

Zuckerberg cited a changing social and political landscape for the changes. He wants to start “restoring free expression” on Facebook and Instagram. This includes getting rid of many of the changes that helped users reduce how much political content they saw in their feeds.

Scale with truth and facts versus fake news.
Image source: Unsplash

Part of the reason for the shift is the current system was making too many mistakes. However, Zuckerberg made it clear that certain types of content will still not be tolerated, such as terrorism, drugs, and child exploitation. The automated moderation system will focus solely on “high severity violations,” versus trying to moderate everything.

Moderation Is The Community’s Responsibility

The new Meta moderation policies don’t mean fact checking is gone for good. Instead, Zuckerberg wants to adopt a system similar to X’s. Musk implemented Community Notes to allow users to add more context to posts that may be misleading. Instead of removing posts, a note appears with the post to let readers know something may not be completely true.

Of course, Meta users are still encouraged to report any posts that violate Meta’s terms. For instance, if the automated system misses a post discussing potential terrorism, users can report it and have Meta review it and take it down.

The goal is to avoid taking down so many innocent posts that were caught in Meta’s filters. Yes, that’s going to mean you’ll likely see more controversial content, but with a focus on less censorship and more freedom of speech, this is expected.

Trump account suspended on Twitter.
Image source: Unsplash

It’s not surprising that this change comes just before President-elect Donald Trump takes office later this month. Meta even donated to Trump’s inaugural fund. Since Meta has been highly criticized for its filters favoring Democrats over Republicans, Zuckerberg is making changes that fit more in line with Trump’s views on censorship and social media, especially after he was banned from Twitter at one point. This also means no longer limiting political and other civic content on Meta platforms.

These changes will affect Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. Depending on the type of content you typically see in your feed, you may not notice anything. But for others, you may start seeing far more political and even controversial topics popping up. Just remember, you’re always free to block anything you don’t like to better control your feed.

Zuckerberg is likely hoping these changes will keep more users on Meta’s platforms. The company even recently created its own AI search engine. Of course, if you don’t like the changes, you can delete your account or try a new social network.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Crystal Crowder Avatar
Crystal Crowder
Crystal Crowder has spent over 15 years working in the tech industry, first as an IT technician and then as a writer. She works to help teach others how to get the most from their devices, systems, and apps. She stays on top of the latest trends and is always finding solutions to common tech problems.

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
From below of blue starry sky over radio telescope and trees with leaves
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
When Cingular chief Stan Sigman backed the original iPhone before its 2007 unveiling, he accepted terms American carriers usually refused: no logo on the device, no control over its software, no preloaded apps, and a share of monthly subscriber revenue flowing back to Apple, after signing on without seeing a prototype
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
A contemplative scene with two scientists in a vintage laboratory setting.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.