Home > News

Apple Breaks Own Rules for Spotify but Not WeChat

By Laura Tucker
Apple Rules Spotify Wechat Featured

If you’re going to set a hard rule, you have to follow that for everyone and can’t pick and choose who should follow it and who shouldn’t. Apple set the rule that users of third-party apps have to go through the App Store for any in-app purchases, but now they’re allowing Spotify to break the rule, while blocking loopholes that allow WeChat to bypass the rule.

Apple Stops Fighting Spotify

Apple and Spotify have been fighting for some time over the rules of the App Store. Apple didn’t want to allow the music streaming app to charge iPhone users for in-app purchases without getting its cut. But now, it has decided to allow Spotify to show pricing and send users to the streaming app’s website to pay for a premium plan.

Apple initially rejected an update for the Spotify app that showed pricing and sent users to the website to sign up for the plan. However, the EU fined Apple $2 billion, claiming anticompetitive practices because of its decisions with Spotify.

Apple Rules Spotify Available Plans

But Spotify specified in a blog post that Apple had a change of heart. Yet, the post also said that the European Commission didn’t leave Apple much choice. Spotify will now show pricing information in the app and will allow users to complete in-app purchases directly on its website.

iPhone users in the EU will see promotional pricing in the App Store. However, Spotify mentioned in the blog post that “it’s only a small step in the long march towards giving iPhone consumers basic product experiences they expect and deserve in their apps.” This is because the streaming service still can’t include a link to purchase any of its extras in the iOS app.

FYI: would you rather not step into this fight and avoid the streaming app altogether? Learn how to delete your Spotify account, then check out these Spotify alternatives.

Apple Puts the Heat on WeChat

While Apple finally acquiesced to Spotify, it’s not wiling to do the same for WeChat – at least, not yet. However, discussions are ongoing between Apple and Tencent Holdings Ltd., the parent company of WeChat.

Tencent is working on a way to offer in-app purchases, while still wading through Apple’s ecosystem. The way the system stands now, Apple would take a cut of every in-app purchase, which, assumably, is by design.

Apple Rules Wechat In App Purchases

Apple is applying more pressure to get the Chinese firms, Tencent and ByteDance (parent company of TikTok), to make changes to the popular apps. They’d like to see loopholes closed that allow app creators for Tencent and ByteDance to accept external payments. Apple wants their 30% cut.

While Tencent doesn’t currently monetize the mini games in the iOS app, there is talk of a way to do that to the benefit of Apple, Tencent, and developers.

The question remains as to whether Apple will eventually back down with Tencent and ByteDance the same way they did with Spotify, or whether they will force the issue to ensure they get their cut. Of course, ByteDance has other troubles as well, with U.S. courts looking to step in to their business model.

All images and screnshots by Laura Tucker.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar
Laura Tucker
Laura has spent more than 20 years writing news, reviews, and op-eds, with the majority of those years as an editor as well. She has exclusively used Apple products for the past 35 years. In addition to writing and editing at MTE, she also runs the site’s sponsored review program.

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
From below of blue starry sky over radio telescope and trees with leaves
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
When Cingular chief Stan Sigman backed the original iPhone before its 2007 unveiling, he accepted terms American carriers usually refused: no logo on the device, no control over its software, no preloaded apps, and a share of monthly subscriber revenue flowing back to Apple, after signing on without seeing a prototype
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
A contemplative scene with two scientists in a vintage laboratory setting.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.