Home > Tech Explained

The Differences Between Permissioned and Permissionless Blockchains

By Andrew Braun
Permissioned Permissionless Blockchains Feature

One of the biggest divisions in blockchain technology is permissioned versus permissionless blockchains. The basic distinction is pretty clear: you need approval to use a permissioned blockchain, while anyone can participate in permissionless systems. The original Bitcoin blockchain was and is still completely open, for example, but as companies and institutions start to adopt the technology, they’re willing to sacrifice trustlessness and transparency for better access controls and easier customization.

Also read: How Blockchain Works and How It Affects You

Why do we care? As similar as the two systems might sound, they really shouldn’t be used for the same things. People probably won’t be so keen on using a permissioned cryptocurrency, for example, since one of the biggest draws of crypto is that no one can control how it works or where it goes. Conversely, a company like Maersk, which uses blockchain to track its shipping logistics, doesn’t want to put all of its confidential data onto a permissionless blockchain.

How permissioned and permissionless blockchains are similar

Both permissioned and permissionless blockchains have some important characteristics in common:

Permissioned Permissionless Blockchains How It Works
  • They’re both distributed ledgers, meaning that there are multiple versions of the same data stored in different places and connected through some type of network.
  • They both use some form of consensus mechanism, which means they have a way for multiple versions of the ledger to reach an agreement on what they should all actually look like.
  • They are both theoretically immutable in the sense that the data they store can’t be changed without having sufficient power over the network. Even then, the blocks are linked by cryptographic hashes that will change if any data is altered.

Put simply, both permissioned and permissionless blockchains use cryptography and decentralization to varying degrees to accurately store data in a format that is difficult to hack or alter.

Also read: Why Giving Blockchains the Ability to Talk to Each Other is a Big Deal

Permissionless blockchains

Most of the blockchains you’ve probably heard of fall into this category: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dash, and Monero. All the others are public blockchains that anyone can transact on or even join as a validator.

Permissioned Permissionless Blockchains Permissionless

All the data stored on these chains is publicly available, and full copies of the ledgers are stored all around the world, which is what makes these systems very hard to hack or censor. No one runs the blockchain, no one can restrict access to it, and you can remain relatively anonymous since you don’t need to identify yourself to get an address and perform transactions.

This type of blockchain tends to generate buzz since it’s what underlies most cryptocurrencies and the most exciting decentralization solutions. The hype is deserved, since permissionless public blockchains can potentially revolutionize services that previously required trusted middlemen – not just currency. An immutable blockchain of cars could give you the ability to look up reliable data on every part, service record, and transaction associated with a used car instead of trusting the guy on Craigslist, for example.

Of course, this system is far from perfect. It can be slow, difficult to build for and scale up on, too transparent to keep sensitive data on, hard to control access to, energy-intensive, and complex. That’s why permissioned blockchains are becoming a more popular solution for companies and institutions looking to use blockchains to replace more traditional systems.

Permissioned blockchains

In a nutshell, permissioned blockchains are only open to those who are allowed access. Anyone who wants to validate transactions and/or view data on the network has to be approved by the central authority first.

Permissioned Permissionless Permissioned

This is especially useful for banks, companies, and other institutions that have to comply with regulations and might not be fans of losing complete control of their data. Instead of building on a large, decentralized blockchain like Ethereum, they can instead create a custom solution run only by institutions that they approve of.

Imagine a watermelon company taking their supply chain to the next level:

  1. The company decides to build a blockchain system to track its delicious fruit from farm to store. They need to ensure that nobody slips in any subpar watermelons and want to know exactly who is involved in each step, so they decide on a permissioned blockchain that only authorized users can access.
  2. They build a Melonchain and give each stop on their supply chain a way to access it and add data, which is validated by a network of servers run by the company. This way, whenever data about a melon is logged, it can be looked up in the ledger and cryptographically verified later.
  3. Certain data about each watermelon, like harvest date and location, is made public for consumers, while other data, like exact movements along the supply chain, are kept confidential to help the company retain its competitive edge.

Facebook’s Libra cryptocurrency is another good example. It might go fully public in the future, but at the time of its launch, only a select number of companies that have invested and been approved will be allowed to operate it, and users may have to sign up with real identities.

The big advantages of permissioned blockchains are that they have:

  • Access controls
  • High customizability
  • An easier time changing to comply with regulations
  • Better energy-efficiency
  • Potentially better scalability

There are disadvantages, too, however. They are:

  • More centralized
  • Less transparent
  • More vulnerable to hacks and manipulation
  • More easily censored
  • Less anonymous

Which one is better?

Permissionless and permissioned blockchains are just branches of the same technology that have developed in response to different needs. Both of them are useful in their own way, and are, for most practical purposes, different technologies.

This means that the benefits brought by a permissionless blockchain don’t map directly over to permissioned systems, so just because a company says it’s using blockchain technology doesn’t necessarily mean it’s that much more private or decentralized than a traditional database. The permissioned-permissionless distinction is where the buzzword really starts to break down, making it a pretty important piece of the puzzle to know.

Image credits: blockchain workflow

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Andrew Braun Avatar
Andrew Braun
Andrew Braun is a lifelong tech enthusiast with a wide range of interests, including travel, economics, math, data analysis, fitness, and more. He is an advocate of cryptocurrencies and other decentralized technologies, and hopes to see new generations of innovation continue to outdo each other.

Read next

A Greenland shark caught in 2016 was carbon-dated to roughly 400 years old, meaning it was already swimming the Arctic when Shakespeare was writing Hamlet — and biologists still can't explain how its cells resist ageing
In 2026, scientists assembled the Greenland shark’s 5.9-billion-letter genome and examined retinas from animals more than a century old, finding intact vision, expanded DNA-repair pathways and unusual chromatin machinery inside a vertebrate believed capable of surviving for nearly four centuries
At 3 gigahertz, a processor has only a third of a nanosecond between clock ticks, enough time for light to travel about 10 centimetres in vacuum before real interconnects, logic gates and capacitance shrink the distance a signal can cross on the chip
When Adobe announced Flash’s end-of-life in July 2017, it closed a technology that had once run on 99 per cent of desktops — and took with it an estimated four million animations, games and interactive works now preserved only by an amateur archive called Flashpoint
When Japan’s trade ministry put the PlayStation 2 under export control in April 2000, its 6.2-gigaflop hardware was considered adaptable for missile guidance, briefly forcing anyone exporting more than one console to seek government approval
Every QR code hides three larger squares in its corners — they let a scanner find the code at any angle, and the pattern also carries enough redundancy to still read after roughly 30 per cent of the code is damaged or covered
Standard QR codes hide three larger squares in their corners so scanners can orient them from any angle, while their strongest Reed-Solomon setting can restore roughly 30 per cent of damaged codewords, though not necessarily 30 per cent of the visible square
In 1911, the Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes cooled a thread of mercury to 4.2 kelvin in a bath of liquid helium and its electrical resistance vanished completely, and a current set circulating in a superconducting loop like that will still be flowing years later, indistinguishable from the day it began
Red, green and blue became the primary colours on every screen because the human retina carries just three types of cone cells — the pixels aren't matching the light, they're matching your eyes
Red, green and blue became the primary colours on every screen because the human retina carries just three types of cone cells — the pixels aren’t matching the light, they’re matching your eyes
Inside a modern processor, transistors switch on and off billions of times a second — and they've shrunk to about 3 nanometres wide, roughly 15 silicon atoms across, close to the physical limit of how small a switch can be
Inside a modern processor, transistors switch on and off billions of times a second — and they’ve shrunk to about 3 nanometres wide, roughly 15 silicon atoms across, close to the physical limit of how small a switch can be