New Intel Processor Vulnerability, “Foreshadow,” Allows Attackers to Steal Data

New Intel Processor Vulnerability, “Foreshadow,” Allows Attackers to Steal Data Featured Image

It just gets harder and harder to keep our technology safe from prying eyes and hands. It seems every time we turn around a new security flaw is turning up. This newest flaw, called “Foreshadow,” affects Intel processors. This means the same parts that are designed as the “brains” of our machines are also making our systems less secure.

Identifying Foreshadow

Researchers from five different academic institutions located this vulnerability. Intel processors are supposed to be secure, as they are defended by Software Guard Extensions (SGX) that allow programs to set up secure enclaves on the processors.

Yet, these researchers explain Foreshadow as a “speculative execution attack on Intel processors which allows an attacker to steal sensitive information stored inside personal computers or third party clouds.

“Foreshadow has two versions: the original attack designed to extract data from Software Guard Extensions (SGX) enclaves and a Next-Generation version which affects Virtual Machines (VMs), hypervisors (VMM), operating system (OS) kernel memory, and System Management Mode (SMM) memory.”

Wired published a report that states the research speaks “to longstanding questions and concerns about reliance on SGX – and whether for all its benefits it also has the downside of becoming a single point of failure for everyone’s most sensitive software and data.”

news-foreshadow-hacker

They add that while “not every user relies on SGX, more and more secure services are exploring the possibility of using it in their consumer products – like the password manager 1Password and the end-to-end encrypted messaging app Signal.”

One of the researchers, Yuval Yaron, a microarchitecture security researcher, stressed the seriousness of Foreshadow by stating it’s “not an attack on a particular user; it’s an attack on infrastructure.”

The Fix

Intel started releasing a fix for Foreshadow via updates on August 14, 2018. Leslie Culbertson, the executive vice president of production assurance and security for Intel, wrote in a blog post that they are not aware of any method being used in real-world exploits yet.

Regardless of that, Intel is still encouraging users to keep everything up to date on their systems and to take all necessary precautions to prevent malware.

The researchers set up a website where they detail why they chose to call this new chip vulnerability Foreshadow.

news-foreshadow-risk

“In literature ‘foreshadowing’ is used to indicate a trick where a writer provides a subtle hint of what is to come later in the story. Analogous to how a good storyteller tries to keep the outcome of the story (mostly) secret, the speculative execution mechanisms found in modern processors do not directly leak secrets.

“In the storytelling analogy the Foreshadow attack shows, however, that clever adversaries can abuse subtle hints in the present to reconstruct secrets from future instructions.”

Will This Lead to a Worrisome Future?

That explanation provided by the researchers is particularly ominous and doesn’t leave a safe feeling. Sure, they’ve identified this vulnerability, but it hasn’t hit yet. And along with their name, “Foreshadow,” we know there’s a hint of something bad on the horizon. Perhaps it’s even worse than researchers are imagining.

Above all, it’s super important here to follow Intel’s advice to keep your system up to date, as they’re working on rolling out a fix. And as they suggested, make sure you take all necessary steps to neutralize malware.

How does this news sit with you? Are you still worried about what’s to come in the future? Or are you comfortable with Intel saying they are releasing a fix? Add your thoughts and concerns regarding Foreshadow in the comments section below.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.
When seismic waves from the Chicxulub impact reached what is now North Dakota roughly ten minutes after the asteroid struck, they appear to have triggered a ten-metre standing wave in an inland river that flung fish onto the bank and buried them under glass beads still falling from the sky.