No Surprise that Instagram and Facebook Are Most Invasive Apps

10 Most Invasive Apps Featured

It’s not a surprise to anyone that a study revealed that two Meta apps, Instagram and Facebook, rank as the most invasive apps in terms of data collected about you. But three of the apps on this top 10 most invasive apps list are quite surprising, considering the company they are keeping. But will this knowledge change what you do?

The 10 Most Invasive Apps Ranked

Software development company Inoxoft studied the policies of more than 5,000 apps on the App Store. These apps are all among the top 100 in their categories. They created their list of the 100 most invasive based on 46 indicators. The level of invasiveness was gauged whether data was tracked, linked, both, or neither.

With a score of 61.47 out of 100 are two Meta apps, Instagram and Facebook. They collect 32 out of the 35 data types, with 25 of them linked directly to the user, with seven linked and tracked. Think about that the next time you’re scanning social media. Though, the FTC did accuse Facebook of violating their privacy agreement to protect children. And that just makes it even worse.

Again, those are obvious choices of social media to head up this list, but if I were going to pick a ride-sharing app that I thought would break into the top 10, I’d say Uber. Instead, it’s Grab: Taxi Ride, Food Delivery. It’s the most invasive of any other app, save for Facebook and Instagram. Grab collects 27 data types, with eight linked to you and 15 linked and tracked. Its invasiveness score was 55.57.

10 Most Invasive Apps Meta
Image source: Unsplash

It’s a three-way time between Threads, Meta Business Suite, and Messenger for fourth, fifth, and sixth place. So Meta is actually grabbing five of the top 10 spots and five of the top six. That’s a bit worrisome, I have to admit. These three had a score of 55.57. While they do collect 32 data types, none of them are tracked.

The last two spots in the top were awarded to Pinterest and AE + Aerie, the name given to American Eagle Outfitters. That’s hard to fathom why the app needs to collect that much data on its customers. But it collects 21 data types, and three of them are linked, while 16 are both linked and tracked. It’s just as surprising as Nordstrom, that takes up two spaces in the top 10, as both the Nordstrom and Nordstrom Rack: Shop Deals apps rank on the list as well.

Will This Encourage You to Delete the Apps?

I have to begrudgingly admit that this isn’t going to change anything for me. I’m not going to stop using Facebook, Messenger, or Pinterest. Instagram I don’t use that often, and the others I don’t use at all. But giving up Facebook and Messenger would be hard. It’s how I stay connected.

10 Most Invasive Apps Pinterest
Image source: Unsplash

I also rely a lot on photo and video apps, mostly photo, to prepare my images for the articles you see here on Make Tech Easier. And that’s the category that is the most invasive. But I don’t see my giving those up either, though I really should get rid of the ones I don’t use.

As Inoxoft COO Nazar Kvartalnyi commented, “It’s essential for users to be aware of the extent to which their data is being collected, linked, and tracked.” He added that this study is “a reminder for consumers not just to accept any privacy policy blindly, but to take control of their privacy settings instead, and stay informed about the data practices of the apps they use.”

That’s what it comes down to for many of us, just being careful about our privacy and the data we share. And I, thankfully, have already checked the boxes with Facebook. Although I could do more, such as using Facebook’s restricted list.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
When Cingular chief Stan Sigman backed the original iPhone before its 2007 unveiling, he accepted terms American carriers usually refused: no logo on the device, no control over its software, no preloaded apps, and a share of monthly subscriber revenue flowing back to Apple, after signing on without seeing a prototype
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.