Home > News

Government Could Force Google to Break Up Its Monopoly

By Laura Tucker
Doj Breakup Google Monopoly Featured 2

Many were surprised – yet not shocked – when Alphabet, the parent company of Google, lost its court case against the U.S. Department of Justice. To push the victory even further, attorneys for the DOJ have included breaking up the Google monopoly to solve the issues.

Feds Release Possible Solutions

Judge Amit Mehta handed down his judgment for the plaintiffs in the antitrust lawsuit against Alphabet. He declared that Google did exist as a monopoly. Now that they have had time to savor the win, DOJ attorneys have released a 32-page filing that includes a list of possible solutions to end the monopoly, solutions that they cite as both “behavioral and structural.”

Doj Breakup Google Monopoly Including Android
Image source: Unsplash

The filing specifically mentions breaking up the monopoly to prevent Google from using its products to give Google Search an advantage. Chrome, Google Play, and Android were specifically called out as products that are currently used to push Search. The DOJ is considering measures that would prevent Google from doing this in the future.

Google was also called out for paying large amounts of money to ensure that Google Search remains the default option on the iPhone and other devices and platforms. It was noted that Google’s rivals can’t compete against the revenue Google earns as a monopoly.

Google’s Reaction to DOJ Filing

Google, of course, wasn’t going to take this lying down in the plush fields of its domain that it has sowed over the years. It fought back in a blog post, noting that the possible DOJ solutions are “radical.”

The company also believes that these changes could make it worse for Internet users. They believe a Google breakup would kill Android and Chrome. They believe it would cause an end to Chrome and Android, as other companies wouldn’t be able to keep them as open source.

Doj Breakup Google Monopoly Search On Chrome
Image source: Unsplash

Oddly, Google added that such a move to break up the company would force them to share users’ personal information with their competitors, leaving privacy and security concerns. It was noted that other companies don’t have the strict security standards that Google does. Some people may find that last line to be hard to take in.

It was even explained in the blog post that strangling Google’s AI tools could limit innovation in the tech world at a critical time. Google believes that the government stepping into AI at this time could skew investment, distort incentives, and cripple upcoming business models.

Google comes off as overly defensive in the blog post, with a list of reasons that a breakup wouldn’t work – reasons that don’t seem very convincing. But if the DOJ does manage to pull this off and break everything up, it could lead to many long-term effects – good and bad – on Google Chrome, Android, and Alphabet’s many other products – and may users of these products could bear the brunt of it.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar
Laura Tucker
Laura has spent more than 20 years writing news, reviews, and op-eds, with the majority of those years as an editor as well. She has exclusively used Apple products for the past 35 years. In addition to writing and editing at MTE, she also runs the site’s sponsored review program.

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
From below of blue starry sky over radio telescope and trees with leaves
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
A contemplative scene with two scientists in a vintage laboratory setting.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.
When seismic waves from the Chicxulub impact reached what is now North Dakota roughly ten minutes after the asteroid struck, they appear to have triggered a ten-metre standing wave in an inland river that flung fish onto the bank and buried them under glass beads still falling from the sky.