Think the Review on Google Maps Is Fake? That Will End Soon

Google Maps Fake Reviews Featured

For as long as we’ve had online content, there have been worries about it being fake, especially with reviews. Sometimes it’s hard to know if the glowing review you are reading is real. Google decided it’s done with that and is issuing restrictions on business found to be posting fake reviews to its Maps app.

Be Wary of Fake Reviews

I’m in the review business, and have been for 21 years, so I understand fake reviews. It’s hard to compete with them, quite frankly. I was even tasked by one company to sniff out their fake reviews. And you have to believe that AI just makes the problem more prevalent.

Businesses want glowing reviews. I’ve had people giving me a service here locally offer to give me the service for free if I leave a glowing review, showing how hard they’re working trying to compete. I will, but it will be an honest review. I’m not going to write that something is the best if it’s not.

Google Maps Fake Reviews Search Reviews

Google knows that and is making changes to remove the fake reviews from its Maps service. Businesses want to be seen on Google Maps and want it to show glowing reviews as well so that customers don’t go to the business down the street instead.

They will pay people to write fake reviews, promise them goods and services, or even money, if they post a good review. And with the amount of real and fake reviews on Maps, the app has become a bit cluttered. Of course, one of the reasons it has become cluttered is because it has started showing ads.

Google Is Removing the Known Fake Reviews

Noting that they “take fake and/or incentivized reviews and ratings on businesses very seriously,” Google announced that it would be imposing restrictions on business profiles that violate the Fake Engagement policy to help curb the fake reviews. And this isn’t the first time that Google has gone after fake reviews.

Google further explained that the potential restrictions could include the business profile not being allowed to receive new ratings or reviews, existing reviews or ratings going unpublished, or a warning to consumers that fake reviews were removed. Businesses would be notified by email if restrictions were placed on them.

Google Maps Fake Reviews Post Review

While these punishments sound like a slap on the wrist, it does take away the very thing businesses are trying to achieve. Further, businesses can appeal the restriction, and Google will take another look at the business’s profile and determine whether it should rescind the restriction.

Darcy Bickham, Senior Content Marketing Manager of SOCI, said, “This shift is crucial because reviews play a pivotal role in customer decision-making. Maintaining a clean, authentic online reputation is more important than ever, and marketers must be vigilant about monitoring reviews and responding to potential violations.

“Google’s crackdown on fake reviews means that businesses can no longer rely on questionable reputation tactics, reinforcing the need for transparency and authenticity in digital marketing strategies.”

She also pointed out the “significant concern” of “false positives,” with a business being wrongfully accused. Additionally, she believes there’s a chance that a business’s competitors could post fake reviews to complicate the review process.

In the past, Amazon has blamed social media for fake reviews. I don’t know if that’s at fault, but I do believe all of it needs to be addressed. I don’t think Google’s restrictions are going to solve everything, but I do think it will start to make a dent in the problem.

Image credit: Pixabay. All screenshots by Laura Tucker.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
When Cingular chief Stan Sigman backed the original iPhone before its 2007 unveiling, he accepted terms American carriers usually refused: no logo on the device, no control over its software, no preloaded apps, and a share of monthly subscriber revenue flowing back to Apple, after signing on without seeing a prototype
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.