Facebook Deals with Another Privacy Scandal, this Time with Its Closed Groups

Facebook Deals with Another Privacy Scandal, this Time with Its Closed Groups Featured Image

It seems Facebook users are lulled into a sense of security when they join or start a closed group. The name itself gives the illusion of total privacy, implying no one can join, read, or view the group that isn’t invited. However, there are people who view the content: marketers.

The Trouble with Facebook’s Closed Groups

A popular use of these groups is for medical reasons, such as people who have dealt with a certain disease all joining the same group where they can share ideas, treatments, successes and failures, etc.

United States Representatives Frank Pallone Jr., the chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Jan Schakowsky, chair of the Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee, sent an open letter to Facebook CEO and creator Mark Zuckerberg. They questioned the privacy practices of Facebook, as well as how it handles closed groups, specifically those dedicated to medical issues.

This was after a consumer complaint was filed with the Federal Trade Commission late last year. It claimed the personal information of the social network users who are in closed groups could have been made available to companies who shouldn’t have been able to access it.

The complaint explained that closed group users discuss information about “substance abuse disorders, about the challenges of parenting transgender children, HIV status, and past history of sexual assault.”

news-facebook-closed-groups-login

The FTC complaint furthered this, alleging that the algorithm Facebook uses “nudges” users into joining closed groups. It also alleged that the social network misleads its users into the belief that the information they share in closed groups will remain private and anonymous. They believe even insurance companies could have access and could use the information to make decisions related to the insurance of users.

Facebook Incredulously Defends Its Practice

Facebook defended the practice in a statement to Gizmodo, explaining it’s “not an anonymous platform; real-name identity is at the center of the experience and always has been,” read the email from a company spokesperson.

“It’s intentionally clear to people that when they join any group on Facebook, other members of that group can see that they are a part of that community and can see the posts they choose to share with that community. There is value in being able to know who you’re having a conversation with in a group, and we look forward to briefing the committee on this.”

It’s quite unbelievable that after all they have been through and been accused of in the past few years that Facebook would actually blame the users. Sure, at this point, it’s probably best to assume that anything that has to do with Facebook is not private, but the groups are referred to as “closed.”

Do you make use of closed groups in Facebook? Are any of them dealing with medical issues? Does this news concern you? Let us know your thoughts about Facebook allowing companies access to your private discussions in closed groups in the comments below.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar

Read next

Octopuses possess roughly 500 million neurons distributed across their body, with two-thirds located in their arms rather than their central brain, meaning each arm can taste, problem-solve, and react to stimuli independently of whatever the octopus is otherwise paying attention to.
The Roman aqueduct at Segovia, built around the first century AD without mortar, still carried water into the 1970s, its 167 granite arches held together by nothing but the precise weight distribution of stones cut to fit each other within fractions of a millimeter.
When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.