EU Fines Google $5 Billion, Accusing Them of Antitrust Abuse with Android. Is This Fair?

EU Fines Google $5 Billion, Accusing Them of Antitrust Abuse with Android. Is This Fair? Featured Image

The European Union has been delving into the technology world as of late, such as with their GDPR policy. Now they have fined Google $5 billion for antitrust abuse with the dominance of its Android operating system. Was this a fair decision?

The Ruling from the EU

Google, owned by Alphabet, was fined a record $5 billion (4.34 billion euro) by EU regulators because the Android mobile OS dominates smartphones, creating an antitrust issue. Google has announced they will appeal the decision because they believe they are creating more choice and not less.

However, officials with the EU insist that Alphabet has been unfair with its own services by forcing and paying smartphone manufacturers to sell their smartphones with Google Chrome and Google Search pre-installed as a bundle, along with Google Play. They also prevent these manufacturers from selling smartphones that have modified or “forked” versions of Android.

Alphabet was ordered by the European Commission to stop all illegal conduct within ninety days or possibly face more charges. This is the largest amount of money Google has ever been fined, including last year when they were penalized $2.7 billion for favoring their shopping service over others.

The EU compared Google to its largest competitor, Apple, saying they did “not sufficiently constrain” Google, but they also pre-install several apps on their iPhones.

news-eu-fines-google-search

This was an effort by the EU to protect consumers, with EU Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager telling CNBC, “They have products that we all like and like to use. The only thing we don’t like is when they get to misuse their success and put in place illegal restrictions.

Google Fights Back

Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, wrote in a blog post that the commission ignored “the fact that Android phones compete with iOS phones.” He added that the EU didn’t consider the choice Android offers phone manufacturers, mobile network operators, app developers, and consumers.

Pointing to the app bundling they do, Pichai reasoned that if users don’t want to use Google’s pre-installed options, it’s easy for them to install alternatives. He suggested the decision could “upset the careful balance” Google has with Android. They let phone manufacturers use Android, which is open source, for free, yet it generates advertising revenue for them when consumers use it.

Analyzing the EU Ruling

In a nutshell, it seems at first that Google is being fined because it’s free and open source, but that’s not the totality of it. In reality, they aren’t really being fined because they’re free and open source, but the Android OS appears on so many different devices because they are free and open source, and the more devices they appear on, the more they’re dominating the market.

Additionally, it seems they’re being fined because they’re so successful. They have so much wealth in the company that $5 billion isn’t going to bankrupt them, but it begs the question if they were fined that amount simply because they have that kind of money.

news-eu-fines-google-three

And in both of these arguments we have to compare Google to Apple, Android’s largest competitor. They also install their own software on their devices. But that’s where the difference lies: their own devices. Apple isn’t paying anyone else to host their software. It only appears on their own devices.

Apple’s iOS software also isn’t open source. And because of that, there are no worries of it flooding the marketplace. There is no danger of multiple companies installing it on their systems. Apple would never allow it.

But where they are similar is in being a tech company with great wealth. Like Android, they, too, are the recipient of many big-money lawsuits and rulings. They can afford it, so it’s easy to dump on them.

In the end, despite the EU’s approach being understood, it still seems a bit unfair. No matter how they got to that, in essence they are still being fined because they are open source and free and because they have the wealth to support such a fine.

How do you feel about the EU’s fine of Google? Do you feel it’s fair for them to be fined because Android appears on so many smartphones and because it’s open source? Is it fair for them to have such a huge fine thrown at them simply because they can afford it? Let us know how you feel about this in the comments section below.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar

Read next

Octopuses possess roughly 500 million neurons distributed across their body, with two-thirds located in their arms rather than their central brain, meaning each arm can taste, problem-solve, and react to stimuli independently of whatever the octopus is otherwise paying attention to.
The Roman aqueduct at Segovia, built around the first century AD without mortar, still carried water into the 1970s, its 167 granite arches held together by nothing but the precise weight distribution of stones cut to fit each other within fractions of a millimeter.
When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.