Despite Rise in Facial Recognition, Apple Isn’t Giving Up on Touch ID

News Apple Touch Id Featured

You may believe that with the advancements in facial recognition and its focus on eliminating the Home button that Touch ID is a dead issue with Apple, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. The company is still working on ways to involve fingerprint-recognition technology on their future devices. What they’re working on would allow devices to still read your fingerprint, despite no appearance of a home button.

Fingerprint Sensor Technology

For a few years Touch ID was the hot thing with Apple’s iPhone and iPads. The home button was used to sign in to your device as well as your online accounts. But that soon became yesterday’s technology as they moved toward Face ID, a facial recognition system.

This newer technology is in effect across many devices from other companies as well. Apple implemented it into their iPhones and iPads. It was a good fit for them as they were also going for edge-to-edge screens that eliminated the home button.

But it turns out Touch ID may not be dead just yet. [They just had two patents approved](https://www.idropnews.com/news/touch-id-isnt-dead-yet-heres-why-apple-wont-give-up-on-its-aging-tech/104548/) for an acoustic imaging system that would be able to still read a fingerprint, yet it would be done through the display instead, assumably because of the lack of a home button.

Acoustical imaging is seen as an alternative method of recognition. Samsung has already used an ultrasonic method of recognition in recent devices, including the Galaxy S10.

Interestingly, Apple filed for these patents initially in 2016, before they made the switch to facial recognition. There have also been previous reports that Apple was working on in-display fingerprint reading.

News Apple Touch Id Fingerprint

It appears that while they focus on the expensive Face ID tech for their higher-end devices, they may consider still using some type of fingerprint recognition on their lower-end devices. Or they could also leave the option up to consumers and give both options on a device.

It was also reported last year that Apple was shopping around for a company to help them produce components for an ultrasonic, in-display fingerprint reader, and that was before the patents were approved.

The Future of Fingerprint Technology

What does this mean for the future of fingerprint technology? It’s apparently not dead and perhaps just going through growing pains. Apple is still working on it, and Samsung is already utilizing something similar.

That said, I’m not sure I want to go back to something I have to “touch.” I have a 2018 iPad Pro with Face ID while still using an iPhone 7 with Touch ID. I much prefer the Face ID. I’m just automatically logged in to frequently-visited apps and websites sometimes without me having to do anything if the passwords are already saved on the site or in the app — no tapping, no nothing. but on my phone I still have to stick my thumb on the home button.

But, of course, maybe that’s the idea, as I would be more inclined to buy a more top-of-the-line device rather than a lower-end one so that I could keep my Face ID.

Do you prefer facial recognition or fingerprint recognition? Would you want to have an in-display fingerprint reader? Tell us how you feel about a possible new and improved Touch ID in the comments below.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar

Read next

Octopuses possess roughly 500 million neurons distributed across their body, with two-thirds located in their arms rather than their central brain, meaning each arm can taste, problem-solve, and react to stimuli independently of whatever the octopus is otherwise paying attention to.
The Roman aqueduct at Segovia, built around the first century AD without mortar, still carried water into the 1970s, its 167 granite arches held together by nothing but the precise weight distribution of stones cut to fit each other within fractions of a millimeter.
When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.