Home > News

Advertisers Jumping from Apple to Android Because of Privacy

By Laura Tucker
Advertisers Apple Privacy Featured

There were plenty of warnings, especially from Apple rival Facebook, that Apple’s plan to give more privacy control to users would upset the proverbial apple cart the tech world’s economics. Early reports show they were right. The privacy policy change has already caused such a shift that advertisers are shying away from Apple, landing on Android.

Apple’s Bold Policy Move

Three years ago, Apple CEO Tim Cook said, “Privacy is a fundamental human right.” That’s always been a strong element of the Apple experience, but now it seems Apple is banking on it to show how it differs from its competitors.

Apple only sells ads on a few of its apps and doesn’t receive a share of the revenue from third-party iOS apps. Its competitors – Facebook and Google – depend much more on ad revenue in their business models.

Advertisers Apple Privacy App Tracking Transparency

Apple announced during the 2020 WWDC that iOS 14 would bring a change in data tracking. It would be forcing iOS apps to disclose what data they keep on users and allow users to opt out. It finally put it into play this spring with iOS 14.5.

Facebook has been very vocal about Apple’s plan. In December, it said Apple’s intention was to “force businesses to turn to subscriptions and other in-app payments for revenue, meaning Apple will profit and many free services will have to start charging or exit the market.”

But Facebook also claimed that it was looking out for the little guy and not itself. Facebook stressed that Apple’s “App Tracking Transparency” would hurt small businesses that were already hurting because of the pandemic. The social media giant stated that one of its studies showed that small businesses might see a 60 percent loss in website sales because of Apple’s new feature.

Results Show Advertisers Working More with Android and Less with Apple

Apple’s new feature forces apps to ask users for permission to track them. I can tell you as an iOS user that I’m opting out. Some apps that I trust and that I feel my data would help, I allow to track me, but with most others, I opt out.

So I leave tracking on overall but opt out of individual apps. With a choice of helping the developers or protecting my privacy, I’m choosing my privacy, and I’m not the only one. Less than 33 percent are opting in, according to Branch Metric Inc., an ad-measurement company.

Advertisers Apple Privacy Android

This has led the prices of iOS ads to fall and the prices of Android ads to rise. Advertisers have complained that throughout the short three months since the Apple privacy policy has been active, they’ve lost much of the data that made iOS ads effective. Without the effectiveness, it’s hard to justify a high cost for the ads.

Now when advertisers buy ads from Apple, it’s much less targeted. Ad agencies claim Facebook’s tools in its social media products aren’t as effective, as iOS users are opting out of sharing their data.

The literal and figurative million-dollar question is how this will affect the tech world business model. Advertisers are hopping over to Android, but Apple doesn’t depend on ads to make money – its third-party app developers do, however, and don’t appear to want users to know their privacy is affected. Will this lead to fewer developers working with Apple? Or will the result be just a change in the business model of a tech business?

Read about the ads Facebook took out in newspapers chastising Apple for its commitment to privacy and about the changes in iOS 15 that include more privacy.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Laura Tucker Avatar
Laura Tucker
Laura has spent more than 20 years writing news, reviews, and op-eds, with the majority of those years as an editor as well. She has exclusively used Apple products for the past 35 years. In addition to writing and editing at MTE, she also runs the site’s sponsored review program.

Read next

When the SS Great Eastern laid the first working transatlantic telegraph cable in 1866, a message that had taken ten days by steamship suddenly crossed the ocean in minutes, and the financial markets of London and New York were forced, within a single trading week, to invent the modern concept of synchronised global price.
From below of blue starry sky over radio telescope and trees with leaves
The Big Ear telescope was scanning at 1420.4056 megahertz on the night of 15 August 1977, the exact frequency at which hydrogen atoms vibrate across the universe, because Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison had argued years earlier that any species trying to be found would broadcast on that channel — and then, for 72 seconds, something did.
In 2016, archaeologists dated two rings of snapped stalagmites in France’s Bruniquel Cave to 176,500 years ago, evidence that Neanderthals had walked 336 metres into darkness with fire and built architecture deep underground long before modern humans reached Europe
Otto von Bismarck was 74 when Germany adopted the world’s first national old-age social insurance program in 1889, setting the pension age at 70 after years of fighting socialists with bans, laws, and a promise few workers would live long enough to use
When cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov stepped out of his Soyuz capsule in March 1995 after 437 consecutive days aboard Mir, doctors recorded him at several centimetres above his pre-flight height, and his spine had become so unaccustomed to gravity that the recovery team carried him to a chair rather than risk the compression of letting him walk.
When Bell Labs engineer Karl Jansky pointed a rotating antenna at the sky in 1932 looking for sources of transatlantic radio static, he kept picking up a faint hiss that peaked every 23 hours and 56 minutes, and he eventually realized he had become the first human to hear the center of the Milky Way.
A contemplative scene with two scientists in a vintage laboratory setting.
When Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne submitted her 1925 doctoral thesis arguing that the Sun was made almost entirely of hydrogen, the field’s senior figure Henry Norris Russell talked her into adding a line calling the result ‘almost certainly not real,’ and then published the same conclusion himself four years later to widespread acclaim.
When seismic waves from the Chicxulub impact reached what is now North Dakota roughly ten minutes after the asteroid struck, they appear to have triggered a ten-metre standing wave in an inland river that flung fish onto the bank and buried them under glass beads still falling from the sky.