<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking LXDE For a Test Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22</link>
	<description>Uncomplicating the complicated, making life easier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.e</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-12547</link>
		<dc:creator>mike.e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-12547</guid>
		<description>keybindings,configs seem really important to some- but I just want things to work!

I dont know why or where I saw lxde(I sometimes use xfce) but the moment I got it for my 555mhz low power VIA eden ,I immediately replaced GNOME on my slow single core laptop. It also gets my signifiant others approval - she too just wants things to work quickly.

 I know how fast win2k and XP can run on a fresh pc so I know I dont need to wait for 0.5seconds for menus to appear,things to go - lxde helps me from getting impatient with kde or gnome on old hardware!!!!

It just works! Im not sure how to add a volume control but alsamixer in a terminal window so until my noobness can google the result thatl do!

Mike
NZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keybindings,configs seem really important to some- but I just want things to work!</p>
<p>I dont know why or where I saw lxde(I sometimes use xfce) but the moment I got it for my 555mhz low power VIA eden ,I immediately replaced GNOME on my slow single core laptop. It also gets my signifiant others approval &#8211; she too just wants things to work quickly.</p>
<p> I know how fast win2k and XP can run on a fresh pc so I know I dont need to wait for 0.5seconds for menus to appear,things to go &#8211; lxde helps me from getting impatient with kde or gnome on old hardware!!!!</p>
<p>It just works! Im not sure how to add a volume control but alsamixer in a terminal window so until my noobness can google the result thatl do!</p>
<p>Mike<br />
NZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.e</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22248</link>
		<dc:creator>mike.e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22248</guid>
		<description>keybindings,configs seem really important to some- but I just want things to work!

I dont know why or where I saw lxde(I sometimes use xfce) but the moment I got it for my 555mhz low power VIA eden ,I immediately replaced GNOME on my slow single core laptop. It also gets my signifiant others approval - she too just wants things to work quickly.

 I know how fast win2k and XP can run on a fresh pc so I know I dont need to wait for 0.5seconds for menus to appear,things to go - lxde helps me from getting impatient with kde or gnome on old hardware!!!!

It just works! Im not sure how to add a volume control but alsamixer in a terminal window so until my noobness can google the result thatl do!

Mike
NZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keybindings,configs seem really important to some- but I just want things to work!</p>
<p>I dont know why or where I saw lxde(I sometimes use xfce) but the moment I got it for my 555mhz low power VIA eden ,I immediately replaced GNOME on my slow single core laptop. It also gets my signifiant others approval &#8211; she too just wants things to work quickly.</p>
<p> I know how fast win2k and XP can run on a fresh pc so I know I dont need to wait for 0.5seconds for menus to appear,things to go &#8211; lxde helps me from getting impatient with kde or gnome on old hardware!!!!</p>
<p>It just works! Im not sure how to add a volume control but alsamixer in a terminal window so until my noobness can google the result thatl do!</p>
<p>Mike<br />
NZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HowtoMatrix &#187; Taking LXDE For a Test Drive</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7418</link>
		<dc:creator>HowtoMatrix &#187; Taking LXDE For a Test Drive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7418</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more at Make Tech Easier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at Make Tech Easier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 23/04/2009: Malaysian Government Moves to Free Software, Ubuntu 9.04 Released &#124; All about MICROSOFT</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 23/04/2009: Malaysian Government Moves to Free Software, Ubuntu 9.04 Released &#124; All about MICROSOFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>[...] Taking LXDE For a Test Drive I found LXDE to a pretty nice desktop environment. It’s certainly fast, comes with a reasonable amount of good quality tools, and a nice appearance. There’s room for improvement, however, particularly when it comes to configuration. I would count it as a good option for recent Windows converts, particularly those with older hardware that might have trouble running a beefier desktop such as Gnome or KDE. Has it pulled me away from my beloved Window Maker? I don’t think so, but it’s progressing nicely and I’d love to see what the developers come up with down the road. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taking LXDE For a Test Drive I found LXDE to a pretty nice desktop environment. It’s certainly fast, comes with a reasonable amount of good quality tools, and a nice appearance. There’s room for improvement, however, particularly when it comes to configuration. I would count it as a good option for recent Windows converts, particularly those with older hardware that might have trouble running a beefier desktop such as Gnome or KDE. Has it pulled me away from my beloved Window Maker? I don’t think so, but it’s progressing nicely and I’d love to see what the developers come up with down the road. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 23/04/2009: Malaysian Government Moves to Free Software, Ubuntu 9.04 Released &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 23/04/2009: Malaysian Government Moves to Free Software, Ubuntu 9.04 Released &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>[...] Taking LXDE For a Test Drive I found LXDE to a pretty nice desktop environment. It’s certainly fast, comes with a reasonable amount of good quality tools, and a nice appearance. There’s room for improvement, however, particularly when it comes to configuration. I would count it as a good option for recent Windows converts, particularly those with older hardware that might have trouble running a beefier desktop such as Gnome or KDE. Has it pulled me away from my beloved Window Maker? I don’t think so, but it’s progressing nicely and I’d love to see what the developers come up with down the road. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taking LXDE For a Test Drive I found LXDE to a pretty nice desktop environment. It’s certainly fast, comes with a reasonable amount of good quality tools, and a nice appearance. There’s room for improvement, however, particularly when it comes to configuration. I would count it as a good option for recent Windows converts, particularly those with older hardware that might have trouble running a beefier desktop such as Gnome or KDE. Has it pulled me away from my beloved Window Maker? I don’t think so, but it’s progressing nicely and I’d love to see what the developers come up with down the road. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brother</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7345</link>
		<dc:creator>brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7345</guid>
		<description>According to the LXDE blog (blog.lxde.org) LXNM will be rewritten, hopefully doing a great job this time =)

As a side note I heard that one of the developers have done a first version of a config application, I have no idea how long he got with it and/or if he had released anything but it might pop up something to rescue the weak points above soon.

I love LXDE, being a KDE guy and working with fluxgen of fluxbox it&#039;s hard to stick to LXDE  but still doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the LXDE blog (blog.lxde.org) LXNM will be rewritten, hopefully doing a great job this time =)</p>
<p>As a side note I heard that one of the developers have done a first version of a config application, I have no idea how long he got with it and/or if he had released anything but it might pop up something to rescue the weak points above soon.</p>
<p>I love LXDE, being a KDE guy and working with fluxgen of fluxbox it&#8217;s hard to stick to LXDE  but still doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brother</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22247</link>
		<dc:creator>brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22247</guid>
		<description>According to the LXDE blog (blog.lxde.org) LXNM will be rewritten, hopefully doing a great job this time =)

As a side note I heard that one of the developers have done a first version of a config application, I have no idea how long he got with it and/or if he had released anything but it might pop up something to rescue the weak points above soon.

I love LXDE, being a KDE guy and working with fluxgen of fluxbox it&#039;s hard to stick to LXDE  but still doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the LXDE blog (blog.lxde.org) LXNM will be rewritten, hopefully doing a great job this time =)</p>
<p>As a side note I heard that one of the developers have done a first version of a config application, I have no idea how long he got with it and/or if he had released anything but it might pop up something to rescue the weak points above soon.</p>
<p>I love LXDE, being a KDE guy and working with fluxgen of fluxbox it&#8217;s hard to stick to LXDE  but still doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Price</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7315</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7315</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running LXDE on testing/unstable at the moment and so far workspace switching hasn&#039;t been a problem for me.  It&#039;s lxde-core version 0.3.2.1+svn20080509-5 if that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running LXDE on testing/unstable at the moment and so far workspace switching hasn&#8217;t been a problem for me.  It&#8217;s lxde-core version 0.3.2.1+svn20080509-5 if that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Price</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22246</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running LXDE on testing/unstable at the moment and so far workspace switching hasn&#039;t been a problem for me.  It&#039;s lxde-core version 0.3.2.1+svn20080509-5 if that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running LXDE on testing/unstable at the moment and so far workspace switching hasn&#8217;t been a problem for me.  It&#8217;s lxde-core version 0.3.2.1+svn20080509-5 if that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Price</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7314</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7314</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard of that one.  I&#039;ll check it out, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of that one.  I&#8217;ll check it out, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Price</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22245</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22245</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard of that one.  I&#039;ll check it out, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of that one.  I&#8217;ll check it out, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWJones</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7310</link>
		<dc:creator>JWJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7310</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I had the same problem when I tried it, too, along with other issues that I can&#039;t recall right now. Stuck with good old Debian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I had the same problem when I tried it, too, along with other issues that I can&#8217;t recall right now. Stuck with good old Debian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWJones</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22243</link>
		<dc:creator>JWJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22243</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I had the same problem when I tried it, too, along with other issues that I can&#039;t recall right now. Stuck with good old Debian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I had the same problem when I tried it, too, along with other issues that I can&#8217;t recall right now. Stuck with good old Debian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWJones</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22244</link>
		<dc:creator>JWJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22244</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I had the same problem when I tried it, too, along with other issues that I can&#039;t recall right now. Stuck with good old Debian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I had the same problem when I tried it, too, along with other issues that I can&#8217;t recall right now. Stuck with good old Debian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kronik</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>Kronik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>I played with the latest KNOPPIX live CD (basically Debian Lenny + LXDE). In live mode desktop switcher/pager functionality did not work. I could not switch between workspaces. I tried to set it up to have only 1 desktop/workspace, but winodow menu was still offering an option to send window to another desktops (that I could not switch to later on). I did not proceed with the installation. Did anybody else run into this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played with the latest KNOPPIX live CD (basically Debian Lenny + LXDE). In live mode desktop switcher/pager functionality did not work. I could not switch between workspaces. I tried to set it up to have only 1 desktop/workspace, but winodow menu was still offering an option to send window to another desktops (that I could not switch to later on). I did not proceed with the installation. Did anybody else run into this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kronik</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22242</link>
		<dc:creator>Kronik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22242</guid>
		<description>I played with the latest KNOPPIX live CD (basically Debian Lenny + LXDE). In live mode desktop switcher/pager functionality did not work. I could not switch between workspaces. I tried to set it up to have only 1 desktop/workspace, but winodow menu was still offering an option to send window to another desktops (that I could not switch to later on). I did not proceed with the installation. Did anybody else run into this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played with the latest KNOPPIX live CD (basically Debian Lenny + LXDE). In live mode desktop switcher/pager functionality did not work. I could not switch between workspaces. I tried to set it up to have only 1 desktop/workspace, but winodow menu was still offering an option to send window to another desktops (that I could not switch to later on). I did not proceed with the installation. Did anybody else run into this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Wolf</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>I have personally found LXDE to be intriguing but lacking for all the reasons noted.

For that reason, I am currently playing with Fragadelic&#039;s debian LXDE distro that bundles an installer and backup in remastersys LXDE Lite.
http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/

Much closer to what a distro should be for HW challenged older PC&#039;s and even current desktops.  Recommend it.

GW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have personally found LXDE to be intriguing but lacking for all the reasons noted.</p>
<p>For that reason, I am currently playing with Fragadelic&#8217;s debian LXDE distro that bundles an installer and backup in remastersys LXDE Lite.<br />
<a href="http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/</a></p>
<p>Much closer to what a distro should be for HW challenged older PC&#8217;s and even current desktops.  Recommend it.</p>
<p>GW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Wolf</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22240</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22240</guid>
		<description>I have personally found LXDE to be intriguing but lacking for all the reasons noted.

For that reason, I am currently playing with Fragadelic&#039;s debian LXDE distro that bundles an installer and backup in remastersys LXDE Lite.
http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/

Much closer to what a distro should be for HW challenged older PC&#039;s and even current desktops.  Recommend it.

GW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have personally found LXDE to be intriguing but lacking for all the reasons noted.</p>
<p>For that reason, I am currently playing with Fragadelic&#8217;s debian LXDE distro that bundles an installer and backup in remastersys LXDE Lite.<br />
<a href="http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/</a></p>
<p>Much closer to what a distro should be for HW challenged older PC&#8217;s and even current desktops.  Recommend it.</p>
<p>GW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Wolf</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-22241</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-22241</guid>
		<description>I have personally found LXDE to be intriguing but lacking for all the reasons noted.

For that reason, I am currently playing with Fragadelic&#039;s debian LXDE distro that bundles an installer and backup in remastersys LXDE Lite.
http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/

Much closer to what a distro should be for HW challenged older PC&#039;s and even current desktops.  Recommend it.

GW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have personally found LXDE to be intriguing but lacking for all the reasons noted.</p>
<p>For that reason, I am currently playing with Fragadelic&#8217;s debian LXDE distro that bundles an installer and backup in remastersys LXDE Lite.<br />
<a href="http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/</a></p>
<p>Much closer to what a distro should be for HW challenged older PC&#8217;s and even current desktops.  Recommend it.</p>
<p>GW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWJones</title>
		<link>http://maketecheasier.com/taking-lxde-for-a-test-drive/2009/04/22#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>JWJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maketecheasier.com/?p=4066#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>I recently bought a refurbished IBM Thinkpad T42, and installed Debian Lenny (Gnome) on it. I don&#039;t particularly like Nautilus, so I replaced that with Openbox. I also installed LXDE as an option, as I do like it very much, aside from, as you said, LXNM. I use the Gnome applet for that, and it works beautifully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought a refurbished IBM Thinkpad T42, and installed Debian Lenny (Gnome) on it. I don&#8217;t particularly like Nautilus, so I replaced that with Openbox. I also installed LXDE as an option, as I do like it very much, aside from, as you said, LXNM. I use the Gnome applet for that, and it works beautifully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.maketecheasier.com

Served from: maketecheasier.com @ 2012-05-26 00:20:29 -->
