http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15 Uncomplicating the complicated, making life easier Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-17215 Fav Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:11:29 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-17215 Exact Duplicate Finder (Freeware)<br>One simple, effectively easy and safe to use, duplicate finder.<br><a href="http://indeepsoft.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://indeepsoft.blogspot.com</a> Exact Duplicate Finder (Freeware)
One simple, effectively easy and safe to use, duplicate finder.
http://indeepsoft.blogspot.com

]]> http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-10254 jom Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:03:17 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-10254 Duplicate Cleaner is another good tool for duplicate files - this uses MD5 hashing, which is better than CRC32 - http://www.digitalvolcano.co.uk/content/duplicate-cleaner Duplicate Cleaner is another good tool for duplicate files – this uses MD5 hashing, which is better than CRC32 – http://www.digitalvolcano.co.uk/content/duplicate-cleaner

]]> http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-21617 jom Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:03:00 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-21617 Duplicate Cleaner is another good tool for duplicate files - this uses MD5 hashing, which is better than CRC32 - http://www.digitalvolcano.co.uk/content/duplicate-cleaner Duplicate Cleaner is another good tool for duplicate files – this uses MD5 hashing, which is better than CRC32 – http://www.digitalvolcano.co.uk/content/duplicate-cleaner

]]> http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-8336 Allan Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:26:45 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-8336 It is possible for two files to have the same CRC-32 but to be actually different. Therefore you should provide the option to compare byte by byte. And comparing by date is absolutely useless since there are many tools which can change the file's date. I recommend, Directory Report, http://www.file-utilities.com It is possible for two files to have the same CRC-32 but to be actually different. Therefore you should provide the option to compare byte by byte. And comparing by date is absolutely useless since there are many tools which can change the file’s date.
I recommend, Directory Report, http://www.file-utilities.com

]]> http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-21616 Allan Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:26:00 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-21616 It is possible for two files to have the same CRC-32 but to be actually different. Therefore you should provide the option to compare byte by byte. And comparing by date is absolutely useless since there are many tools which can change the file's date. I recommend, Directory Report, http://www.file-utilities.com It is possible for two files to have the same CRC-32 but to be actually different. Therefore you should provide the option to compare byte by byte. And comparing by date is absolutely useless since there are many tools which can change the file’s date.
I recommend, Directory Report, http://www.file-utilities.com

]]> http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-5226 bom Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:05:52 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-5226 great tool, just what i needed long time ago. been doing this manually. great tool, just what i needed long time ago. been doing this manually.

]]> http://maketecheasier.com/identify-duplicate-files-and-delete-it-with-utmost-care/2009/02/15#comment-21615 bom Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:05:00 +0000 http://maketecheasier.com/?p=2439#comment-21615 great tool, just what i needed long time ago. been doing this manually. great tool, just what i needed long time ago. been doing this manually.

]]>